Man’s Quest For Divinity
The Religious Foundation Of Evolution
Eugenics: The Religion of the Elite
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population,
and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any
of their more rebellious members."
- Margaret Sanger
Supervisor of the ‘Negro Project’
"No rational man, cognizant of the facts, believes that the average Negro is the equal, still less the superior,
of the white man.”
- Lay Sermons
Addresses, and Reviews (1871)
Anglican Priest, Charles Kingsley, lectured his flock with these words:
“The black people of Australia, exactly the same race as the African Negro, cannot take in the Gospel... all attempts to a knowledge of the true God has as yet utterly failed... Poor brutes in human shape… they must perish off the face of the earth like brute beasts.”
- Sermons on National Subjects,
Sermon XLI, Macmillan & Co., pp. 414ff (1880)
“Negros are not equal to other races.”
- Apostle, Bruce McConkle
Mormon Doctrine, pp.527 (1966)
And, as one U.S. President put it:
“Some day we will realize that the prime duty, the inescapable duty of the good citizens of the right type is to leave his or her blood behind him in the world; and that we have no business to permit the perpetuation of citizens
of the wrong type.”
- Theodore Roosevelt (1913)
“We... sought first to stop the multiplication of the unfit. This appeared the most important and greatest step
toward race betterment.” 40
Big money (and later big government) continued to drive eugenics at the expense of the lower classes. But after many years of research, the eugenics movement was exposed as a fraud. A Carnegie review panel concluded that most of the Eugenics Record Office research lacked any scientific merit, and recommended a halt to its propaganda.42
The American Eugenics Society, another sector of the movement, was funded by some of America’s richest dynasties. Consistent with the Eugenics Creed (which states: "I believe in such a selection of immigrants as shall not tend to adulterate our national germ plasm with socially unfit traits"), the AES lobbied diligently for restrictions of ‘inferior stock’ from immigrating to the U.S.43 Some of those personalities included:
- Edward H. Harriman, investor and railroad magnate. After his death, his wife contributed $500,000 to establish the Eugenics Record Office, which urged forced sterilizations and anti-immigration laws. The Harriman banks would later back Hitler leading up to and during WWII.
- John D. Rockefeller, founder of Standard Oil, the largest oil company in the world at the time. The Rockefellers also funded: 1) The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany, largely responsible for the Nazi atrocities leading to WWII. 2) Alexis Carrel, winner of the Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine, who advocated lethal gas for future Nazi atrocities. 3) The Population Council, who’s President, Frederick Osborn, stated in 1968: "Eugenic goals are most likely to be achieved under another name than eugenics." 4) And Alfred Kinsey, American biologist and professor of entomology and zoology, who founded the Institute for Sex Research.
- Henry Ford, automobile assembly-line mogul. Henry and son Edsel established the Ford Foundation in 1936, which ultimately fell into enemy hands. Those enemies would include Barack Obama and his mother, Ann Dunham; Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s Pastor; and '60s Weather Underground terrorist bomber, Bill Ayers (Obama, The Postmodern Coup, Webster Tarpley, p. 63). The Ford Foundation today doles out billions for Population Control.
- John H. Kellogg, of Kellogg’s Corn Flakes fame. Mr. Kellogg served on the Advisory Council of the American Eugenics Society and founded the Race Betterment Foundation. (To his credit, Kellogg adopted a number of black children.)
- Clarence Gamble, heir of the Procter & Gamble company. Mr. Gamble was instrumental in Margaret Sanger’s Negro Project, which coaxed (or possibly bribed) negro clergymen and doctors into pushing birth control in black communities. Gamble also founded the Pathfinder Fund, another Population Control operation, which, according to its Mission Statement, “strives to strengthen access to family planning [and] ensure availability of safe abortion services...”
Many others of the elite lent credibility to the eugenics campaign simply by their prestigious memberships. The American Eugenics Society, for instance, boasted such affiliates as banker J. P. Morgan, chairman of U. S. Steel; Mary D. Biddle, tobacco fortune heiress; the Dodge family of Phelps Dodge & Company; Robert Garrett of the Maryland and B&O Railroad; E. B. Scripps of United Press (currently UPI); Dorothy H. Brush of Brush Electric Company, and Noah Slee (husband of Margaret Sanger), the inventor of 3-in-One Oil.
U.S. tax dollars also played a huge role through such consortiums as the World Bank, the United Nations Population Fund and the World Health Organization.
VIPs of the movement today include: Ted Turner, founder of CNN, who’s pledged one billion dollars to the United Nations over a ten-year period; George Soros, business magnate and financier, who’s pumped millions into Population Control; ‘Uncle’ Warren Buffet, maverick billionaire investor (and alleged insider), whose billions are helping to "save the planet"; and Microsoft founder and population control advocate, Bill Gates, whose father was a Planned Parenthood supervisor. Because so much of their wealth has been given to "charity"—in some cases up to 50%—Turner, Soros, Buffet, Gates and others are tremendously esteemed in our culture today. However, a quick glance at who gets the
money  may deter such veneration.
- Columbia University (Jesuit controlled)
- Animal Rescue Foundation45
- Music Rising46
- International Women’s Media Foundation (feminist propaganda)
- Family Planning Support (abortion propaganda)47
- Captain Planet Foundation ("saving the earth for kids" propaganda)48
- Planned Parenthood (abortion propaganda)
- UN Millennium Project (socialism, gender equality and environmentalism propaganda)49
- National Press Foundation (government/New World Order propaganda)
- National Public Radio (government/New World Order propaganda)
- Public Library of Science (evolution propaganda)
- Aspen Institute, Inc. (New World Order propaganda)
- United Nations Foundation (New World Order propaganda)
- World Health Organization (over-population propaganda)
Giving billions of dollars to organizations that are already rich—and probably have agendas similar to their benefactors—certainly stretches the word "charity."
Prior to the rise of Naziism the U.S. had numerous eugenics programs in place in over half the states.50 Wikipedia reports that these policies “provided much of the inspiration” for Hitler (entry: Eugenics in the United States). One particular program—Better Babies—was even promoted in American churches. On any given Sunday, eugenically oriented sermons, recommending marriages of "best with best,” 51 were heard from pulpits across the land.
The outrage that resulted from such policies led to a national embarrassment, and since has been very hushed, especially in our public schools and popular media. And now, less than a century later, a black cloud of those policies has reemerged as Family Planning, this time against the unborn... a certain kind of unborn.
Two cases in point: Author Julian Simon observed in his 1996 book, The Ultimate Resource, that 75 percent of state-supported abortion clinics in the United States were located in 10 southern states where only 19 percent of the population—mostly black—lived. Simon surmises that “the proportion of blacks in a local population is closely related to the density of family planning clinics.” Likewise, Erma Craven in her volume, Abortion, Poverty and Black Genocide (1972), states that abortions among black women at the time were 2.5 times greater than any other group in New York. These figures indicate that eugenics among blacks is a on-going program, though a little obscured.
Positive Eugenics is a term used by the elite to engender optimism and good cheer, while remaining aloof to the hardship of the lower classes. Positive Eugenics refers to such measures as in-vitro fertilization, egg transplanting and cloning. Selective breeding is still utilized and deemed ‘positive,’ but close marriages are out of favor; incest in most cultures is a taboo as well as a crime.
Positive Eugenics is likely the motivation behind the world’s first ‘human sperm reservoir‘—i.e., the ‘Genius Sperm Bank’—where nearly 230 children have been conceived from the sperm of ‘humankind's best.’ Among generous donors are Nobel Prize winners William Shockley, who suggested that those with IQs below 100 should be neutered,52 and J.D. Watson (co-discoverer of DNA), who concurs with Planned Parenthood that abortion should be permitted until the "right sex" is conceived.
Negative Eugenics is a useful term too, referring to programs encouraging low birth rates among the under-evolved, such as sterilization, segregation, and—as we have seen—dark agendas in black communities.
Eugenics in one form or another has existed throughout time. In ancient Rome the father was given the ‘sole right’ to determine whether his child lived or died. Deformed infants were put to death immediately, often by drowning in the Tiber River. Others were bathed in wine and exposed to the elements; the ones who "survived" were "fit" to live. In Athens and Sparta babies were taken to the city elders who determined their fate; male infants with little or no military potential were taken to Mount Taygetos and tossed into a deep gorge.54 Thankfully, with the rise of Christianity, infanticide came to an end.
Today with Christianity in decline, baby killing has revived—with a hellish vengeance. In the U.S. alone, more than 56 million (almost a fifth of the population) have been butchered since 1973 (when abortion was legalized). Over 1.3 billion world-wide have been killed (a quarter of the world’s population) since 1980. And, like the patriarchs of old, still largely determine whether a child lives or dies: 1) A father or grandfather who doesn’t want a mixed race off-spring will often talk the girl into aborting it. 2) A father might be embarrassed by his unmarried daughter’s pregnancy and pay to have the baby killed. 3) A boyfriend may not want his lifestyle disrupted. 4) The male boss may not want the inconvenience. 5) And the male abortionist just wants to make a ‘decent living.‘ And lest we forget, the vast majority of politicians and
Australia: During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, children of mixed races were forcibly removed from their parents
and put into institutions. A. O. Neville, the State’s Chief Protector of the Aborigines, stated: “... they have to be protected
against themselves whether they like it or not. They cannot remain as they are. The sore spot requires the application of
the surgeon’s knife for the good of the patient, and probably against the patient’s will.” Neville referred to these policies
as “uplifting the native race.”
During the earlier white settlements, natives were considered little more than brute savages. War; importation of
disease; poisoning of water, flour and sugar were all utilized and justified. One distraught Christian missionary
reported the killing and decapitation of 45 aborigines, whose heads were boiled down and ten of the best shipped off for
Canada: The Sexual Sterilization Act of 1928 called for the neutering of the mentally ill, who were all determined by IQ
tests. It later came to light that those who were unable to pass the tests were immigrants who had not yet acquired a
good command of English. During the Great Depression, such programs were employed “as a way of relieving society
of the financial burdens imposed by defective individuals.”
Brazil: The Whitening Policies were authorized to increase the number of whites and mulattos (mixed races) for
industrialization. These measures were accomplished by reducing the number of Asians and African slave descendants
deemed "unfit" for civilization. The Rockefeller Foundation, formidable in implementing many of these programs,
sloganed to the effect, "... to sanitize is to eugenize."
Japan: Eugenic Houses of Prostitution were set up for American servicemen and the allies after WWII to preserve the
"purity" of the Japanese race. The policy’s official declaration stated: "Through the sacrifice of thousands of Okichis of
the Showa era, we shall construct a dike to hold back the mad frenzy of the occupation troops and cultivate and
preserve the purity of our race long into the future..."
Sweden: The Sterilization Act of 1934 encouraged "voluntary" sterilizations of all mental patients (though at times pressure and coercion were used). The Swedes believed that ethnicity and race were connected to mental and physical health. In the end, more than 62,000 people were neutered, in particular, women who were perceived easier to manipulate than men. The Sterilization Act was heartily endorsed by the Lutheran Church.
Germany: Between 1934 and 1937 the Nazis sterilized an estimated 400,000 people, prompting one American eugenicist to moan: "The Germans are beating us at our own game." Hitler earlier related to one of his confidants:
“I have studies with great interest the laws of several American states concerning the prevention of reproduction of people who’s progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock.” 58
In due course, countless masses of Germany’s "unfit" were put to death through programs such as Aktion T4, while hundreds of thousands of the incurably sick were terminated by medication and starvation. In one African colony, genocide was carried out against a number of natives, while “bastard studies” and skull studies were carried out among others. (Assistance for these crimes was provided by the aforementioned Charles Davenport.)
Means of procuring "more favorable stock" involved coercing young single women to fornicate with Aryan men and get pregnant, while in occupied territories children were taken from their parents and given to German families.
Information below reveals an interesting connection between Hitler’s Third Reich, Western corporations, American billionaires, Zyklon gas and the U.S. abortion pill, RU-486.
After the FDA approved RU-486 in Sept. of 2000, the abortion lobby was unable to find an American company
willing to produce it. When a firm owned by communist China agreed to manufacture the pill, financial backing was provided by the Rockefeller Foundation (USA). Interestingly, 60 years prior to this, at the outset of WWII, Rockefeller was partnering with I.G. Farben, a Nazi firm, through a subsidiary called Standard I.G. Farben. This was the company that produced (with slave labor) Germany’s deadly Zyklon gas. After WWII and Germany’s defeat, I.G. Farben changed its name to Hoechst I.G., and one of its auxiliaries—Roussel Uclaf—became the French company that developed the RU-486 pill.
How interesting that the firm producing Germany’s Zyklon gas, also assisted in the development of the RU-486 abortion pill, which was manufactured in a communist nation. And in both cases, were backed by the same American dynasty—the Rockefellers.59
United States: To a large extent, racism persisted in America long after slavery was abolished in 1865. During the 1904 World’s Fair, an African pygmy by the name of Ota Benga was exhibited at the Fair’s Monkey House to show his likeness with the chimpanzees. The poor man ultimately committed suicide. 2,000 Indians were also exhibited at the Fair to show their inferiority to the "whites." 60 After the Fair, many Africans were shipped to New York to be shown at the Bronx’s Human Zoo. 61
Owing to this racist mindset, the U.S. Congress, earlier in 1871, annulled many Indian Treaties, forcing them off lands they had lived for hundreds of years. The Cherokee, Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw and Choctaw migrated on horse, wagon and foot, to new lands in Oklahoma, over a thousand-miles away. 4,000 Cherokee alone died along the way.
George Washington and Henry Knox, a century prior, had proposed removing the Indians, but it wasn’t until the Presidency of Andrew Jackson (and the discovery of gold on Indian lands) that the Indians were finally uprooted. The Indian Removal Act drove over 46,000 Indians from their homes (and their gold).62
The U.S. Supreme Court, under Chief Justice Marshall, ruled in favor of the Indians, but "Ole Hickory" defied the
Court—and the Constitution—declaring: “John Marshall made his decision, now let him enforce it.” The President, you
see, had an army. Justice Marshall didn’t. The U.S. Constitution, the greatest guarantor of liberty man has ever known,
was powerless under the religious fanaticism of evolution, to protect people considered sub-human. Evolution, if not
stopped, may someday destroy the Constitution, all liberty and the United States itself.
Many other nations: Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, all bowed at the feet of the Darwinian idol (a monstrosity of an ideology that violates the very laws of science),63 neutering, displacing and murdering hundreds of thousands of human beings along the way.
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil” (Isaiah 5:20).
Though many people are beginning to question the rationale and logic behind evolution, the global ruling-class remains fully committed to it, and will force their foul schemes with political power if they must. Nobel laureates Hermann Muller (geneticist and educator), Joshua Lederberg (molecular biologist) and Francis Crick (co-discoverer of DNA) are just a few on board perpetuating this disgusting racket.64 Other more radical eugenicists, such as psychologist Richard Lynn (alleged racist and sexist65) and psychologist Raymond Cattell (purported racist and fascist66) have no scruples coercing it with technology and government force.
Fortunately, for the present, such extremes have been averted; e.g., Articles 23 and 25 of the 'Convention on the Rights of Persons of Disabilities,' adopted by the United Nations in March 2007, prohibits the compulsory sterilization of the disabled and even allows them to adopt children. Such rulings may be reassuring today, but there are no guarantees such safeguards will be in place tomorrow. Due to the ‘uncompromising faith’ of evolutionists and eugenicists, such laws could evaporate like tomorrow’s morning dew. As Julian Huxley (first Director-General of UNESCO and founder of the World Wildlife Fund) hinted in 1947,
“... even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”
- Wikipedia entry, EUGENICS
participants? Or will the monument creators, if they really believe what they declare, lead humanity by example and depart first? (The world would be much better off if they did.)
In contradistinction to “maintaining humanity under 500,000,000,” God commanded humanity in the beginning to “... multiply, and fill the earth” (Gen. 1:28). It was repeated after the Flood (Gen. 9:1) and has never been rescinded.
(Note: The myth of over-population has been repeatedly debunked by Treehugger: http://www.treehugger.com/sustainable-product-design/at-nycs-density-the-worlds-population-could-live-in-texas.html. Various charts and calculations on their website give solid proof that there’s more than enough room on our planet for today’s 7.5 billion people. To give one example, if everyone were compressed into the density of New York City, all 7.5 billion could easily fit within the borders of Texas.) 67
* * *
Around the turn of the 20th Century, Thomas Hunt Morgan (1866–1945), American evolutionary biologist, geneticist and embryologist, found that human intelligence was too complex to be understood in simple Mendelian hereditary terms. His vast research smoothed the way for the termination (at least for now) of the eugenics experiment.68 The later Hardy-Weinberg Theorem added credibility to Morgan’s work. The Gale Genetic Encyclopedia asserts:
“The Hardy-Weinberg theorem... made it clear that eugenic selection directed solely against affected individuals would barely reduce the incidence of a trait in the larger population. To decrease such defects by half would require forty generations [1,000 years] of perfect negative eugenics.” 69
Hence, eugenic sterilization programs could hardly ever reduce the ratio of so-called mental defectives in a given population, and the idea that low IQ families placed an economic load on society is now soundly refuted. “[E]ugenics was a mistake,” admitted historian and sociologist J. Marks, in a talk at the 1996 International Congress of Human Genetics, “but one that was destined to be overturned because it was the product of ignorance and prejudice...” 70 It was incorrectly assumed (by misusing the laws of Mendel) that all traits were inherited from single genes, stretching the idea to include complex human behavior, which is not produced by genes. “Such ideas were highly flawed for two obvious reasons,’” observed Creation Worldview...
“First, where does a sanguine personality end and a melancholia take over? How could there be a gene
for optimism, pessimism or racism?”
Eugenicists also falsely assumed there were no “environmental influences on individual development”:
“[A] person with an excellent mind may never develop it because of poor nutrition and poverty in their youth.”
- "The Cruelty Of Eugenics And Euthenasia"
Creation World Ministries
In sum, superior parents do not always produce superior children, any more than deficient parents always produce deficient children. Parents that show certain traits (desirable or undesirable) may indeed carry them, and might even transmit them, but not necessarily so. And, as Natural News reports, most harm done to the human genome today is man-made, such as toxins sprayed on crops, applied to processed foods and added to water. Damage also results from harmful vaccinations, which
“... can pass from generation to generation through a process known as epigenetics, even when subsequent generations are not directly exposed to those chemicals.”
In your authors opinion, human flaws and imperfections, mutations and genetic loss, are not the result of Darwin's "survival of the fittest," but sin and human degeneracy, otherwise know as the ‘Genesis Curse’ (Gen. 3).
"There’s no respect of persons with God.” - Rom. 2:11
“From one man [God] made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth.” - Acts 17:26-27
“Do we not all have one Father. Did not one God create us?” - Malachi 2:10
Which of these worldviews—Creation or evolution—is more likely to provide the world with brotherly kindness and racial harmony that we so desperately need? To ask is to answer. In view of the lies we’ve been told for thousands of years—by potentates, politicians, and at times churchmen—the Biblical view cannot be stressed enough, in our nation, in our communities and in our churches.
“God created man in his own image.”
- Genesis 1:27
We also examined the ancient teachings of Apotheosis—men evolving into gods—and how this strange doctrine continues today in the highest degrees of Masonic and Rosicrucian secret orders, and the Mormon Priesthood. No further proof is needed to prove that men are devolving and regressing, not evolving.
We assessed further examples of devolution; e.g., history’s savage wars, barbarities against infants and the unborn, and how the killing of the unborn has held back—and is still holding back—human progress.
And lastly, we looked at evolution’s darker side—eugenics—including its extreme form, Population Control, which seeks to eliminate nearly the entire human race. (This too they call ‘progress.’)
If history has taught us anything at all, it's taught us that man is completely corrupt and powerless in attaining anything of lasting decency, beauty or value. In his many attempts of building a "heaven on earth," a "hell on earth" has been the result. Though he reflects in many ways the Image of his Creator, and is capable of many amazing accomplishments, he is degenerate, sinful, and a veritable failure.
“They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none who does good.
The LORD looks down from heaven upon the children of men, to see if there are any who understand, who seek God. They have all turned aside, they have together become corrupt; there is none who does good, no, not one.”
- Psalm 14: 1-3
"And I heard a great voice out of the throne saying, ‘Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he shall dwell with them, and they shall be his peoples, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God: and he shall wipe away every tear from their eyes; and death shall be no more; neither shall there be mourning, nor crying nor pain, any more: the first things are passed away.’ And he that sitteth on the throne said, ‘Behold, I make all things new.’ And he saith, ‘Write: for these words are faithful and true’” (Rev. 21:1-5).
The words, “Write: for these words are faithful and true” (verse 5), is God’s promise and guarantee that this day will come to pass.
The Old Testament prophets clearly foresaw that Someone—Someone very special—was coming to reverse the worldwide order of decay and death that has plagued our world for so long. The Bible’s first recorded prophesy hinted at Who this Someone might be...
… [And] the Lord God said to the serpent [the devil],
“Cursed are you… I will put enmity between you and the woman [Eve], and between your seed and her seed; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel” (Gen. 3:14,15).
Many have viewed this prophecy as the Proto-Evangelium, or First Gospel.
The expression, "Enmity between you and the woman," refers to the hostility that would persist throughout the ages between those who love and obey God, and those who have shunned God. This tension continues today.
The term, "Her seed," indicates an offspring of Eve Who would have no human father. A ‘female seed’ is biologically impossible, and can only refer to a virgin birth—i.e., the virgin birth of Christ (cf. Mat. 1:23).
"You will strike his heel," signifies Satan’s assault on Jesus via the crucifixion. As horrendous and painful as it must have been, it was the lesser of the two blows; death could not hold Jesus.
The phrase, "He will crush your head," denotes the greater blow, the devil’s crushing defeat as a result of Jesus’ Resurrection.
The War of the Ages—the greatest war ever fought—took place on the Cross two thousand years ago. Satan, the great deceiver and archenemy of the human race, was totally and utterly crushed, and will never recover. This was God’s plan from eternity, "from the foundation of the world" (1 Peter 1:18-20).
The "seed of the woman" was God Himself in human form, the Second Person of the Trinity, and has promised He will come again in the clouds of Heaven (Acts 1:11; Heb. 9:28), "in flaming fire" (II Thes. 1:7), and will show the whole world that He was—and is—the One history has anticipated and watched for. On that day “Every eye will see Him” (Rev. 1:7), and everyone will give an account to Him.
To be saved from sin and everlasting punishment, you must:
- Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ (John 8:24; Acts 16:31)
- Repent of your sins (Mat. 3:2; Luke 13:5)
- Confess Christ publicly (Mat. 10:32-33; Rom, 10:9-10)
- Be immersed (baptized) into Christ for the remission of your sins and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 2:38; 22:16).
- And live faithfully until death (Rev. 2:10; James 1:12)
God Omnipotent, Who has “set eternity in the human heart” (Eccles. 3:11), has at last provided for it. But only
by His Grace—and our obedience to that Grace—can we ever attain it. On that dreadful Day Jesus will either be your tender Savior or terrible Judge.
38 Galton, HEREDITARY GENIUS; 1869, 1
39 Livingstone, TERRORISM AND THE ILLUMINATI; p. 155
40 Sanger, MARGARET SANGER AN AUTOBIOGRAPHY; pp. 374-375
41 Andrew Carnegie, January 28, 1902
42 Criticism of Eugenics, http://www.eugenicsarchive.org/eugenics/topics_fs.pl?theme=26&search=&matches=
43 Wikipedia entry, CHARLES BENEDICT DAVENPORT; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Davenport
44 Infowars, BILL GATES PAYS MEDIA TO PORTRAY HIM AS A SAINT;
45 Look to the Stars, WARREN BUFFET; http://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/183-warren-buffett
47 Look to the Stars, Ted Turner; http://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/1300-ted-turner
49 George Soros, LOOK TO THE STARS; http://www.looktothestars.org/celebrity/275-george-soros
50 Britannica on-line encyclopedia, http://www.answers.com/topic/eugenics
51 SELDEN, TRANSFORMING BETTER BABIES INTO FITTER FAMILIES: ARCHIVAL RESOURCES AND THE HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN EUGENICS MOVEMENT, 1908–1930;
52 Wikipedia entry, WILLIAM SHOCKLEY; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Shockley
53 Wikipedia entry, JAMES DEWEY WATSON; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._D._Watson
54 Wikipedia entry, EUGENICS; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics#Pre-Galtonian_philosophies
56 Australia, Aborigines And White Settlers The Breaking Down of Aboriginal Society;
and Wikipedia entry, Timeline of Aboriginal history of Western Australia;
57 Creation ex nihilo, March, 1996
58 Discover, Sept. 2003, p. 77
59 Saynsumthn’s, LARGE CORPORATIONS FUND PLANNED PARENTHOOD (VIDEO CLIP); http://saynsumthn.wordpress.com/category/bill-gates/
60 The Century For Young People by ABC, Peter Jennings
61 Wikipedia entry, OTA BENGA; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ota_Benga#Bronx_Zoo
62 Jones Report, EUGENICS QUOTES; http://jonesreport.com/article/09_08/05eugenics.html
63 Ferrell, THE EVOLUTION HANDBOOK; Chap. 18, ‘The Laws of Nature.’ Also see Peterson, UNLOCKING THE MYSTERIES OF CREATION; p. 111, Scientific Laws &Principles That Support Creation And Contradict The Theory Of Evolution
64 Wikipedia entry, EUGENICS; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics#Marginalization_after_World_War_II
65 Wikipedia Entry, RICHARD LYNN; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn
66 Wikipedia entry, RAYMOND CATTELL; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raymond_Cattell
67 Treehugger, AT NYC’S DENSITY, THE WORLD’S POPULATION COULD LIVE IN TEXAS;
68 Gale Encyclopedia of Public Health, EUGENICS; http://www.answers.com/topic/eugenics#ixzz1lA4ZvLGJ
69 Gale Eugenics Encyclopedia, GENETICS; http://www.answers.com/topic/eugenics#ixzz1lA4ZvLGJ
70 Science and Eugenics; NOTES,
“What I say unto you, I say unto all... Watch!” - Jesus (Mark 13:37)